More Copyright Threats

When I checked my e-mail the last time before packing my computer, I found the following…

Stuff Fundies Like Contact: Copyright violation
From:
Adam
church17866@msn.com

Message:
this is what we are referring to
http://www.stufffundieslike.com/2012/02/help-wanted/

This post as taken from churchjobfinder.com against their copyright
protection and it must be removed immediately or churchjobfinder will
be notified of this posting.

It also violates their terms and conditions in many areas. The site
specifies that the posts are not ot be used for reproduction it’s
against federal law! however you can read the terms and conditions for
yourself. http://www.churchjobfinder.com/terms.asp

I understand you may not have known this when the article was posted,
but now you kno you are in violation and should delete the post ASAP
so legal action is not taken.

Here we go again some more. I’m going to assume that “Adam” is probably the same person who has been spamming the comment section on that same post.

150 thoughts on “More Copyright Threats”

  1. Dear Adam,

    Maybe instead of strongly representing your own misunderstanding of how fair use & commentary work with regards to copyright law, you should spend more time recruiting some of our other idiotic trolls. I think you’ll find that you get along amazingly.

        1. George is our typo gremlin. He followed Don into the blog. (He was working really hard on me for this post — took me three times to get his name right!) ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

  2. “This post as taken…”

    Now, there has to be a letter missing from that third word. What could it be? I’m going to assume the letter writer was talking about himself, and add an ‘s’ to the end of the word ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

    1. I think he actually needed parentheses(or maybe dashes — I’m never sure where to properly use dashes), around the phrase “as taken from churchjobfinder.com against their copyright
      protection”, and doesn’t need to be contorted into a compound sentence where the subject “This Post” is trying to accomplish both the “taken” & the “must be removed”.

  3. Here is a classic example of one of this guy’s posts from the other page. I am truly speechless.

    Number1of6 March 1, 2012 at 9:34 pm

    “Modern versions contradict themselves! How can that be Godโ€™s Word????? God only said it one way, there can only be ONE Godโ€™s word. Therefore anything else is a lie because it is not Godโ€™s word. If the KJV is not Godโ€™s word then please show me where Godโ€™s word is. And if itโ€™s not in English then Godโ€™s a moron.”

    If it’s not in English then God’s a moron?? I had no idea that God only spoke in English. I was just reading a book called “How to Abuse, Insult, and Insinuate in Classical Latin.” I think I should bust that out for conversations with this guy.

    Oh and notice that he is number 1 of 6, not any other number. Too bad they can’t just get one more person at their church so they could have God’s number instead of the Devil’s. :mrgreen:

    1. “If the KJV is not Godโ€™s word then please show me where Godโ€™s word is. And if itโ€™s not in English then Godโ€™s a moron.โ€

      ๐Ÿ˜ฏ ๐Ÿ˜ฏ ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

      That’s a rather irreverent statement about Elohim, isn’t it? You seem to deify the Bible and denigrate the very One who inspired Scripture and promised to preserve it.

      Regardless, there are some passages you would do well to study.

      Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits. Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good. (Romans 12:16-21 KJV)

      As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love. These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full. This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you. Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. (John 15:9-13 KJV)

      Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another. No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us. Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God. And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him. There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love. We love him, because he first loved us. If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also. (1 John 4:7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18-21 KJV)

  4. Taken from the terms and conditions:

    “The following is a partial list of User Content that is prohibited on ChurchJobFinder. The list below is for illustration only and is not a complete list of all prohibited User Content. ChurchJobFinder prohibits content that:

    is implicitly or explicitly offensive, such as User Content that engages in, endorses or promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual;
    harasses, incites harassment or advocates harassment of another any group or individual;”

    The original advertisement, as posted on that website, violated the terms and conditions of the site churchjobfinder.com and as such the user should have their registration terminated.

    1. And before anyone argues with me on that; the orginal advertisement said that “sodomites” should be executed.

      It also said that divorcees cannot work as a pastor and that women should be silent in church, both I believe would be considered discriminatory statements (although certainly not as bad as being condemned to death. In fact, being condemned to be an IFB pastor might be a fate worse than death, lol).

      1. Also:

        “The Company specifically prohibits any other use of ChurchJobFinder, and all Users agree not to do any of the following: (a) to use this Site’s Resume Database for any purpose other than as an employer seeking employees”

        If the position is, as believed to be, a voluntary position, then does it actually count as an employer seeking employees? Isn’t it highly deceitful to post on an employment website a volunteer position without making that fact clear to all who might go to the trouble to apply for the position?

  5. This “Adam” must be the one who called himself “one of six” or “six of one” or whatever it was, I kept getting messages on this topic last night and none of them seemed to make any sense… ๐Ÿ˜ˆ It’s too bad these people never use the same name all the time, they just want to confuse you as to who they are. That one of six or whatever it was reminded me of the Borg “You will be assimilated.” Which is not unlike what Fundies do. You will be assimilated… resistance is futile…” ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

  6. Dear Adam: In June of 2011, in a lawsuit against a Vietnam veteran who posted all 19 paragraphs of an editorial from the Las Vegas Review-Journal on medjacksports.com to prompt discussion about the financial affairs of the nationโ€™s states. The veteran won because the judge ruled that such posting was fair use. Feel free to read the jusdgement yourself: https://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/righthaven-v-hoehn.pdf

    Reproducing copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, commentary, teaching and research is fair use, and is well established in both statute and case law.

    It might be a good idea to have some knowledge about a subject before you contact someone about it.

  7. I wouldn’t be very scared of any potential “legal action” by someone with Adam’s grasp of spelling and punctuation. I’m guessing his skill at parsing laws is on a par with his writing ability.

  8. I don’t get this latest post. To me it’s not funny or entertaining. It’s almost boring. Although, I did find it interesting that the author of the post was “packing” his computer. Why is he packing? Is he going to pack his bags and computer and go home? Do you think he’s ever heard of these neat things called “laptops” that you don’t need to pack like the old computers that filled a room?

    1. Darrell is in the middle of moving from one house to another. He apparently plans to take his computer along. Nothing strange about that. This post wasn’t intended to be funny. Not all posts here are.

  9. I don’t really understand when people do this:

    “We stand firmly and without shame on these precepts… wait… you’re copying them onto a blog and people are actually commenting on them now?!?! COPYRIGHT!!! COPYRIGHT!!!”

    One of these days, fundies are going to have to figure out that being heard by a lot of people and being disagreed with go hand in hand (I know, I know, I’m just beating my head against a brick wall).

    1. Kind of reminds me when Jack Schapp said he didn’t care what anyone thought of him–until he showed his ass on 20/20 and then his videos started coming down left and right.

  10. First of all it’s not my husbands grammar you should be ripping on. The e-mail sent and the job listing is my grammar. Also apparently you do not know grammar yourself or else you would realize there really is nothing wrong with the job posting. Yeah i may be missing a comma or two big whoop, and yes i missed a w in the e-mail sent. You want to know why? The w button doesn’t work properly, and the reason i didn’t use proper grammar in the e-mail to begin with is because it’s 11:30 at night and i was tired. Now if my grammar is so absolutly horrible then answer this… Why do i have a bunch of awards for academic excellence, and all of this other junk from when i was in PUBLIC SCHOOL!!! We never said we were against Public Education we just said we’re against bible college. Now Yes i will homeschool our children when we have children to be homeschooled. However we never said we were against public education. And while we’re going at my grammar if it’s so horrible then why do i have 16 awards for how great i was academically. Surely grammar does not descend that much in the 2 years i have been out of highschool. Or the one year i’ve been out of college for after getting A’s in my English/Writing courses.
    These awards are just from my senior year in High School!
    Certificate of Excellence (From the School itself)
    NYS Regents High School Diploma
    Binghamton High School Diploma (With a seal that says Honor Grad, and Successful completion of Regents examination)
    Schools to Careers Outstanding Student Award (From the State Senate)
    Special congressional Recogniton (From The House Of Representatives)
    2010 Partnership for Excellence Award (From the Binghamton Mayor)
    National Technical Honor Society (This is for Outstanding character and Achievment)
    New York state assembly Certificate of Merit Outstanding schools to Careers Student
    Certificate of Achievement (From the school i attended)
    Certificate of Achievement for Outstanding Performance (From the Teachers Association)
    Certificate Recognition(From Schools to careers Partnership through the Broome-Tioga boces where i took a two year course for Early Childhood Education)
    The national Society of High School Scholars (this is for getting good grades in High Schol ๐Ÿ˜ฎ )
    I also have a Certificate for Perfect Attendance
    BOCES Career and Technical Education Scholarship (Apparently they give you money when you have bad grammar considering i had to write the winning essay in order to get this Scholarship)
    2010 certificate of Excellence with National Recogniton (From the National Technical Honor Society and Broome Tioga Boces)
    I also had the Highest NOCTI Test scores for Early Childhood Education not only out of my class, but out of all of the classes taking Early Childhood Education
    Oh and i saved the best for last. Since i’m so grammatically incorrect Barack Obama decided to give me an Award for Outstanding Academic Excellence. Which also came with a letter and a pin.

    Yeah i’m human and i have some typo’s but gramatically incorrect i am not.

      1. An award for physical fitness is different than an aard for Outstanding Academic excellence?!?! Plus it goes mainly based on grades. So therefore based on my grades compared to that of the other students at BHS; my grades we’re better or equal to a few and so i was chosen!

        Plus you point out the one from the president what about the other 15?

        1. My point was that in public school, you just have to be breathing to receive some awards. And you are no longer in high school, this is the ‘real’ world. If you were sincerely serious about the ad for a pastor, then you should have taken the time and effort to do it right. Instead, you dashed something out late at night, with so many grammatical and spelling errors as to be painful to read. I am guessing you are still quite young, and haven’t realized yet that all those awards mean NOTHING if you can’t get the job done right.

        1. @tatortotcassie it’s not a parody. Number1of6wife is the author’s wife of the original post on job-finder. These are fresh trolls off the ship with no idea what this site represents to the IFB. They are a fringe group and that response is real.

          AMAZING!

    1. Hon, do you know how to use spellcheck? Because that would save you a lot of embarrassment. If you don’t have spellcheck (though I don’t know why you wouldn’t — even wordpad has it these days) you can take your stuff to spellcheck.net and that will do it for you.

      Seriously, if I see another person using a “i” for the word “I”… well, let’s just say it won’t be pretty.

      1. yes. I = always capitalized when using it as a first person singular pronoun.

        Also of all the things to capitalize, it’s hard to imagine why “she” picked “Public Education” in the middle there. Lastly, I’m curious where her grammar had gone for it to be descending for 2 years? Is that a trip home from Mars?

      1. BTW, that last sentence where she’s making grammar errors (duplicating I as the subject of both verbs, and still refusing to capitalize I) while insisting that she isn’t grammatically incorrect is both precious & feels like a tipoff to being parody.

        1. If it’s not parody, then reworking the ending clause of that sentence as if you were avoiding ending with a preposition, when there’s no preposition in the clause feels like some of the tricks people that aren’t good with grammar try to play to prove they are good at grammar.

    2. Uh, oh! Mention grammar, and this English teacher springs into action, almost reflexively!

      The wife’s comment above contains a run-on sentence and a fragment. Also the word “typo’s” in the last line doesn’t need an apostrophe, but the word “husbands” in the top line does. There is an interrogative sentence which should end with a question mark instead of a period, as well as several missing commas, a couple misspelled words, and lots of incorrect capitalization.

      I don’t usually point out errors because we all do make mistakes, but claims of grammatical accuracy should actually be accurate! ๐Ÿ™‚

    3. Wow. Just wow. I have been a professional writer for years, and let me just say that her rant is packed full of grammar errors. The fact that she won so many awards is not proof of her academic excellence–it is instead proof of her school’s low standards.

      And yes–she’s like a tone-deaf person insisting that she sings well.

    4. This has to be fake. HAS to be. Who the heck remembers the names of all their piddling awards that get given out like candy? I mean, I won a bunch of certificates in school. I certainly don’t still have them, let alone remember a list of them off the top of my head.

      Also, SAND SCRIPT???

      1. Greetings Darryl

        You are treading on dangerous ground. You have ilegaly posted copyrighted material on this site without the permisson of the original author and are in danger of violating the copyright act.

        As a lawyer, I am obliged to tell you that you are facing a possible fine of up to $250000 dollars if you are found guilty of fraud. Also, there is possible jail time. Have you heard of Kim Dotcom? This si no different to what he did.

        Also, you all have a real issue with authority. Don’t you know that things that are different are not the same? It’s why the modern versions keep being made, because of copyright. They have to change words so they don’t infring on other publishers copyrite. But if you stick with the godo old King James AV1611 you don’t have to worry about copyright because it has none. Why would God copyright His word when he wants everynoe to have it? That’s right, he wouldn’t, adn that is one of the reasons the King James is God’s perfect word. What about epople who can’t speak english? They should learn english, like old testament converts who had to learn to speak jew in order to have Gods word. God only gave his word to the israelis, not to the palestinians or the gentiles in the old testament. Then he gave it to us in english (but in greek first, and then God used a king to transalte it because where the word of a king is, there is POWER!). No kings were involved in the making of the modern versions (only queens, and by queens, I don’t mean the quen of EngLand).

        You need to repent of this Darril and take this post down (because also, by posting an email, you are posting private information and breaching your correspondants privacy act.

        Please comply so that further legal action is not needed.

        Thank you
        Lionel McCoy

        1. I counted at least 31 typos in this post. If this guy were legit he would’ve at least typed coherently and have corrected his mistakes with good old fashioned proofreading. He can’t blame George for those 31 or more typos because as we who are regulars on SFL, George only picks on those of us he likes. That would not include Mr. Lionel McCoy. ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

        2. OMG! The thoroughness of this is just spectacular. I’m calling the commenting/performance art project of the year.

        3. The comments section on a blog is definitely considered being officially served notice of cease & desist. Very billable time by Barrister Lionel McCoy Esquire.

        4. “They should learn english, like old testament converts who had to learn to speak jew in order to have Gods word.”

          Speak Jew? What?? HAHAHAHA!!!

        5. If you represent the owner of purported copyright material, you should send a proper Cease and Desist request to the site owner. If you are not, you have no “obligation” of any sort, whether you are, as you assert, an officer of the court or not. You may advise, but it’s entirely voluntary. And not advisable, since you clearly don’t practice copyright law at all. ๐Ÿ˜Ž You threaten “further legal action” when none has been taken. Nice, almost lawyerly in its obfuscation, but not quite good enough. Also, copyright violations != fraud. IANAL, so I’ll stop there.
          It’s easy enough to see what’s really going on here: the references to “problems with authority” and “repenting of” things make it all too plain. This is some KJVO layman attempting to defend the institution of his prejudices. The resto if it is pretty sad defenses of using the KJV, with the truly sad “speak jew” stuck in there. The sensible counterargument of the wording of the Great Commission and the practice of the Church Universal would go right by this guy’s head.

        6. OH MY GOODNESS!!! Too funny! after all of the diggs and chatter over the spelling and grammar in this thread, this alleged attorney would post this drivell?
          I’m flomouxed! I’m astounded! I’m, I’m,… just…LOL, LMAO, ROFLMAO… ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

        7. ๐Ÿ˜† That’s hilarious! My favorite was the line about learning to “speak jew” ๐Ÿ˜€ . And if you still think that was a serious post, just click to see what website AV1611Truth’s name brings you to. I love you guys…

      1. If she’s the first of six, and she’s only been out of high school for two years, either:

        – Adam’s been really busy in those two years, or;
        – Adam needs to be speaking to the police about her age at ‘marriage’, or;
        – She repeated high school a few times. Which might account for the amount her grammar has descended in that time.

    5. *sigh*

      I’m a professional writer. I can tell you that while your grammar isn’t any worse than the general public’s, it also isn’t any better. You’ve got a number of errors in your rant. Unless you also wrote that at 11:30 at night, I’ll assume you have a tepid grasp, at best, on the rules of the English language.

      1. p.p.-As I read your comment, I suddenly had a vision of short haired male, long skirted female protesters with signs that read “OLDE ENGLISH GRAMMER RULES!”[sic] and “1611-THE IMMOVABLE LANDMARK”

  11. What I like is the dichotomy between “grammar doesn’t really matter that much” & “I haz gud grammer n spyllink n stuff.” ๐Ÿ˜†

    Interestingly enough, I don’t feel the need to trot out my awards and credentials if/when someone comments on a grammatical error I’ve made. ๐Ÿ˜• In fact, most mature individuals simply take the point, make the correction, and move on.

    Unless you’re my eight year old son who must always. be. right. come hell or high water. ๐Ÿ’ก Son?! Log off SFL immediately and get back to your homeschooling! :mrgreen:

    1. Honestly, I don’t consider grammar to be that important when chatting in a forum or on facebook or commenting to a blog post. In those situations the chat seems to be more informal and it more mirrors the idea of talking with your mates rather than giving a speech to a crowd.

      However, there are times when you need to have good grammar online. When you are submitting an ad to a website that is representing your church, you need it to be squeaky clean. Typing with a broken W key and poor grammar just doesn’t cut it – and the W key is easy enough to fix when you can just buy a cheap keyboard and plug it into one of the laptop’s USB ports.

      1. You can also buy a laptop keyboard (most models sell for around $20 to $25, some go as high as $40 – $45), and they make videos for any model laptop on how to change the keyboard (about a 10 minute job).

  12. Greetings Darryl

    You are treading on dangerous ground. You have ilegaly posted copyrighted material on this site without the permisson of the original author and are in danger of violating the copyright act.

    As a lawyer, I am obliged to tell you that you are facing a possible fine of up to $250000 dollars if you are found guilty of fraud. Also, there is possible jail time. Have you heard of Kim Dotcom? This si no different to what he did.

    Also, you all have a real issue with authority. Donโ€™t you know that things that are different are not the same? Itโ€™s why the modern versions keep being made, because of copyright. They have to change words so they donโ€™t infring on other publishers copyrite. But if you stick with the godo old King James AV1611 you donโ€™t have to worry about copyright because it has none. Why would God copyright His word when he wants everynoe to have it? Thatโ€™s right, he wouldnโ€™t, adn that is one of the reasons the King James is Godโ€™s perfect word. What about epople who canโ€™t speak english? They should learn english, like old testament converts who had to learn to speak jew in order to have Gods word. God only gave his word to the israelis, not to the palestinians or the gentiles in the old testament. Then he gave it to us in english (but in greek first, and then God used a king to transalte it because where the word of a king is, there is POWER!). No kings were involved in the making of the modern versions (only queens, and by queens, I donโ€™t mean the quen of EngLand).

    You need to repent of this Darril and take this post down (because also, by posting an email, you are posting private information and breaching your correspondants privacy act.

    Please comply so that further legal action is not needed.

    Thank you
    Lionel McCoy

    1. “What about epople who canโ€™t speak english? They should learn english, like old testament converts who had to learn to speak jew in order to have Gods word.”

      ๐Ÿ˜ฏ ๐Ÿ˜† Sigh. “epole?” “speak jew?” “Gods word?” Given your own apparent grasp of English (note the uppercase ‘E’), it’s no surprise you misinterpret Scripture. And I sincerely doubt your claim to being an attorney.

    2. Dear AV1611 Truth, Attorney-at-Law,

      If someone speaks Jew then is Gods word for them the one written in Jew or is it still the AV1611? Do you know of any case law on this? I would like to study to shew myself approved in this matter.

      Thank you,

      Elijah Craig

      1. Greetings Elijah.

        My mistake. I shouldn’t have said jew, but Jewish. The Jews spoke Jewish. But you should have known what I mean.

        You have an intresting name. I wonder if you live up to the great man of God that Elijah was. Have you ever read any of his preaching? If you did, you would know that he hated the prophits of baal and killed them all. Today’s modern Bile perversions hate the prophits of God (some of them even remove the word baal, because the true author of the modern versions doesn’t like to give away his secrets).

        You’re question makes me laugh. If you had studied the history of the King James and how God gave his word you would know the answer. Only willingly ignorant fools reject the KJV. But here is the truth: The jews were given the oracles of God. But in 1611, God gave his word in perfect form to the gentile nations, and set aside Israel (it’s in Romans. You should read it sometime). That is called double inspiration. Can God perfectly translate a language? Yes, he did it already in Acts 22 where Paul speaks in the hebrew tongue and Luke records it in greek (perfectly). And since the majority of the world speaks english and spoke english in 1611, God gave us His word in english, the common language. Today’s common language is not jewish, so why would we need to learn how to speak it?

        1. The Jews spoke Hebrew.

          And 1611 English is NOT the common language of the day. Why should we have to learn that to be able to understand the word of God?

        2. Of course! I knew it didn’t sound right to say “speak jew”, it’s gotta be that they converted to “speak Jewish”. That’s much better! All fixed! Nothing to see here, people! Let’s go speak some Jewish.

        3. Dear AV1611Truth, Attorney-at-Law,

          Thank you for the response. I am still somewhat confused. So the Old Testament was written in Jewish and used to be Gods word but now that the Bible is in English it is no longer Gods word? So the Jew Bible used to be perfect but now it is of Baal? How did something as perfect and eternal as Gods word stop being Gods word?

          Thank you in advance for your answer. I look forward to learning more to shew myself approved.

          Elijah Craig

        4. If you are looking to Romans for proof of the Jewish people being “set aside” you have missed out. Observe that we, the gentiles, are the olive branch that has been grafted on, and the Jewish people can be more easily grafted back on. God hasn’t forsaken them.

        5. Am I missing something? Please tell me this is a joke.
          Seriously, am I missing something?

    3. Before we give AV1611Truth any semblance of credibility (not that any us really have) let me direct you to the website linked in his name….. http://www.faithfulwordbaptist.org. For those of you who may not know, that is Steven “pisseth against the wall” Anderson’s crazy corner of the world.
      I almost feel honored to have him commenting here (I think the operative word in my last statement is *almost*). Carry on.

        1. I’m with RobM in thinking this is a very well done parody. The fact that they link to Steven Anderson is part of the brilliance of the post. I also like that they posted it twice, I suspect intentionally. If you’ve got a pulpit to pound, even if it’s wrong, pound it over and over again. Anyway, I vote a very well done piece of humour.(last word spelled with a nod to the AV1611) ๐Ÿ˜‰

        2. Eric – I actually spelled honor with a *u* above but took it out. I should have left it in as a tribute to the 1611 spelling. Well done.

        3. Yes, pretty sure this is a parody, but it is well done! However, little touches like “prophits” and “speaking jewish” gave it away ๐Ÿ™‚

    4. Does your law firm have a web site? Do you have a professional bio or CV anywhere on the web? Could you provide case citations for other copyright cases that you have been involved with? What states are you licensed in? What law school did you graduate from?

      Unless you provide some kind of evidence that you are actually an attorney, I will presume that you are not. If you have recently immigrated and English is not your native language, my apologies in advance.

  13. I was trolling along
    On SFL today
    When I met another
    Troll coming my way.

    She was the wife
    Of six of one
    She couldn’t spell
    But she sure was fun.

    Her husband said
    That He would sue.
    His threat is bogus
    And her post is too.

  14. So, I says to myself, “Golly gee, why don’t I check out the SFL blog and see what’s up. I haven’t been over there in a while and want to see what the ol’ gang is up to.”

    What the bloody hell?

    So, we got a disgruntled website owner who’s trying to scare Darrell (or Darryl, if you will), which isn’t really working very well (Darrell NEVER plays along). Then, wife of aforementioned website owner who’s proud of her grammarical talents, but seems to lack them. And, then we have Mr. Esquire who’s threatening Darryl (or Darrell, if you will) via blog comments (Mental Note To Self: Don’t hire this guy FOR ANYTHING).

    And so I ask myself…. Why DID I come here again?

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

      1. How interesting you should mention corn while I’m eating Doritos. An appropriate description of our guests.

        Corn tortilla triangles (i.e. little squares with something missing)

        ๐Ÿ˜‰

        1. “Little Squares with Something Missing” might be one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard. That’s every fundy I know.

    1. Careful, Natalie…you may offend our guests with your incredibly foul language. ๐Ÿ˜‰

      Although I personally find blatant slaughter of the English language via grammatical abuse and improper spelling more offensive than an appropriately placed minced oath. ๐Ÿ˜›

  15. Like everyone else, I can’t figure out whether the AV1611 dude’s posts are legit or parody. But they sure are funny. I was laughing my head off last night.

    1. Love “Dargill”..

      Other options include, but are not limited to:

      Derryl
      Daayrl
      Diril
      Diryl
      Derghl
      Darrhl
      Durrul
      Dorrell
      Dayriil

      Or my personal favorite (thanks to autocorrect, who will probably sue me for copyright infringement):

      Darroil

  16. I am sad to say , but I think that the AV1611 posts are real . if yo look at the profile it lists a lukeasourus as the profile name , a simple search of that name returns many posts that are consistent with this sort of theology and also with some connection or affinity to Steven Anderson .
    now as far as him being a lawyer , that i question highly

      1. Let me add though, I don’t think AV is real but do think the wife is, unless I’m just really that gullible and someone is chuckling now and in that case, I’m repo-ing butt cushions.

        1. Well, now that I get a good look around, I notice that there seems to be an absence of butt cushions. You know, the Devil just loves when the butt cushions are just lazily left at home. He cackles when our behinds sit on hard pews making us squirm and lose interest in the managawd. And, he shouts, “Huzzah!” when those of you (and YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE) pick up your butt cushions and leave before the invitation is over.

          He knows and I know and I’m going to tell your pastor.

    1. But my profile also links to Lukasaurus. Oh well, the cat is out of the bag.

      Glad you enjoyed it. Now, please don’t go looking up my old posts because I’m ashamed of what you will find. I did used to be hardcore Ruckmanite and probably would have believed every word I wrote up there. Perhaps I’ll keep the parody going in other threads where legal action is required.

      Gravatar! Y U Give away my identity.

        1. I love them, too, but I’m terrible gullible. I usually don’t get that they’re a parody until 99.99% of the rest of everyone has gotten it.

    1. And, of course, this was put in the wrong place and was meant for the comment above this that was a response to JoeR.

      *marks George down on the Not Speaking To list*

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.