A Fundamentalist View of Hell

[TurningIntoDavid]

(04-17-2012 11:41 AM)exOBCstudent Wrote:  First of all, if not everyone is a recipient of God's love then the Bible LIES when it says the "God so loved the WORLD". Then also in that case God IS a respector of persons and you get in through some kind of "buddy system". I don't think you really believe that do you?

Second, adopted children don't choose their PARENTS it's vice-versa. And even if the kid doesn't want their parents who chose them, they can't EVER disown them through adoption. My father spent much of his entire life in adoption homes/foster parents so I've learned something about that situation.

If Christ FIRST loved us AND chose to redeem us then we are His and in His family. If CHRIST chooses whom to impart love to then "whosoever will may come" is also a lie. Right?

I rarely get to see new arguments for Eternal Hell theory. (No offense to anyone on here, but I've been having this debate for almost a year now and most of the objections are standard). These three UR (Ultimate Reconciliation) arguments are all new to me. I'm not sure the last one works though...

it's like i said earlier.

a. God wants to save everyone.
b. God Can save everyone.
c. God isn't going to save everyone.

Calvinists accept b and c, arminians like a and c, and UR's accept a and b (rejecting c).