Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years
02-10-2012, 03:21 PM
Post: #88
RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years
I'm not seeing a significant difference between what I indicated and what the NC Bar says. If you name a guardian, barring any extenuating circumstances, the court will grant guardianship.

Perhaps its an issue of semantics. As in, the court only choses between A B or C if the parent never named a guardian. If A was named guardian the parental wish will be fulfilled unless there is a reason A is not fit in which case the court decides another option.

boymom: What in the thelogical region of eternal punishment is a daddy-daughter ball?

amyrose5:No one is in charge around here. Except maybe the rabbit. He thinks he is. But we do keep him in a cage, so that limits his real control.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - C_Fresh - 02-10-2012 03:21 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)