|
9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years
|
|
02-10-2012, 03:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years
I'm not seeing a significant difference between what I indicated and what the NC Bar says. If you name a guardian, barring any extenuating circumstances, the court will grant guardianship.
Perhaps its an issue of semantics. As in, the court only choses between A B or C if the parent never named a guardian. If A was named guardian the parental wish will be fulfilled unless there is a reason A is not fit in which case the court decides another option. boymom: What in the thelogical region of eternal punishment is a daddy-daughter ball? amyrose5:No one is in charge around here. Except maybe the rabbit. He thinks he is. But we do keep him in a cage, so that limits his real control. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)





