9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years

[myotch]

(02-10-2012 10:57 AM)lucrezaborgia Wrote:  I'd be fine with that too except no one but the government and the church would probably refer to it as a civil union. On the flip-side...how is a mere name change going to make things different for opponents? It's still the exact same thing but with a different name.

Not to mention that "separate but equal" does not fare well legally, considering court precedent.

I'm not saying gays should actually want their own water fountains, but if they did, those water fountains would be fabulous.