9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years

[greg]

I'm still somewhat confused (imagine that!) but I'll give it at least one more shot.

1) I did not say that "since homosexuality is a choice it shouldn't be protected by civil rights."

2) I did not say "chosen behaviours don't merit civil rights."

3) I did not say that "I imagine black people are outraged by homosexuals hi-jacking civil rights."

Can you see how a simple man, such as myself could get confused? So what's left?

Freedom of religion is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, in fact, it is one of the primary reasons our forefathers came here, surely you see no such right in our Constitution for the perverse practice of homosexuality?