Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

dramaturge · 07-10-2012, 04:31 PM

(07-10-2012 06:43 AM)Arch Radish Wrote: Shoot, Gothard promoted abstinence among MARRIED couples.

http://www.recoveringgrace.org/2012/06/s...ual-rules/

Yeah, Gothard had one of the weirdest buffet-style homages to the OT law. I'm pretty sure Paul would consider him a Judaizer.

lucrezaborgia · 07-10-2012, 05:01 PM

(07-10-2012 04:11 PM)JessB Wrote: Personally, I think a circ is more attractive than a non-circ. Just mho.

Have you even seen an intact penis up close and in person when erect?

07-10-2012, 05:29 PM

(07-10-2012 05:01 PM)lucrezaborgia Wrote:
(07-10-2012 04:11 PM)JessB Wrote: Personally, I think a circ is more attractive than a non-circ. Just mho.

Have you even seen an intact penis up close and in person when erect?

This thread is getting a little too graphic.

lucrezaborgia · 07-10-2012, 05:35 PM

(07-10-2012 05:29 PM)Bob M Wrote:
(07-10-2012 05:01 PM)lucrezaborgia Wrote: Have you even seen an intact penis up close and in person when erect?

This thread is getting a little too graphic.

It's a human body part. Why is that graphic?

~~Persnickety Polecat~~ · 07-10-2012, 06:48 PM

(07-10-2012 05:01 PM)lucrezaborgia Wrote:
(07-10-2012 04:11 PM)JessB Wrote: Personally, I think a circ is more attractive than a non-circ. Just mho.

Have you even seen an intact penis up close and in person when erect?

I know which I prefer. (nsfw)

dramaturge · 07-10-2012, 09:19 PM

(07-10-2012 05:01 PM)lucrezaborgia Wrote:
(07-10-2012 04:11 PM)JessB Wrote: Personally, I think a circ is more attractive than a non-circ. Just mho.

Have you even seen an intact penis up close and in person when erect?

I have. I tend to prefer circumcised. Also for a slightly more graphic reason that I will not elaborate on in this thread since it's terribly off-topic and oh-the-delicate-eyes-and-ears. hahaha. That said, I wouldn't refuse to fool around with/sleep with a guy merely because of the state of his member. It's superficial, and I've learned to adjust the other graphic thing for the non-circumcised member.

That's probably all tmi, but hey, it's a thread about circumcision. haha.

Don · 07-10-2012, 10:25 PM

Off the top of my head I would say we have only scratched the tip of this turgid subject. I'm sure the conversation will continue to limp along without me and my small talk.

Paisley · 07-11-2012, 12:52 AM

(07-10-2012 12:57 PM)Don Wrote: $110.00??? Wow! my parents shopped around and found a half-off deal when I was born...

YIKES!! Sorry to hear that. But my kid is young, so it wasn't very long ago, if that makes you feel better. Smile

C_Fresh · 07-11-2012, 07:39 AM

(07-10-2012 10:25 PM)Don Wrote: Off the top of my head I would say we have only scratched the tip of this turgid subject. I'm sure the conversation will continue to limp along without me and my small talk.

I think some people have a stance that is very hard on this issue. I suppose its not the size of the issue but how you handle it. Some might prefer the issue to be nipped in the bud thanks to the 'ew' factor. Others think its perfectly natural to discuss.

lillypie82 · 07-12-2012, 08:40 PM

I'm actually enjoying this conversation... it's a topic that has been on my mind a LOT lately because I'm afraid our next baby will be a boy and we will have to make a decision one way or the other... so I'm always interested in other people's viewpoints on the subject.

And pretty much the only reason I can come up for NOT keeping it intact is "But won't it look funny??" I don't exactly have enough info for comparison there though... perhaps more internet research is needed...