![]() |
|
9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - Printable Version +- SFL Forum (http://www.stufffundieslike.com/forum) +-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Politics and Current Events (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years (/showthread.php?tid=3643) |
RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - bean - 02-09-2012 04:02 PM Quote:Glad to know we're winning the culture war. I've been so busy ruining straight people's marriages and trying to destroy society that I just haven't had time to notice. I can't think of too many marriages that have been ruined by gay marriage. RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - lucrezaborgia - 02-09-2012 04:05 PM (02-09-2012 02:44 PM)greg Wrote: let me splain it to ya
RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - Tooktheredpill - 02-09-2012 06:49 PM Quote:People don't "select" their color, homosexuals choose that lifestyle, (I believe) If they are "bent" toward homosexuality (not admitting that they are) Greg, I'm going to use some very simple (and sad) logic to settle this issue once and for all. In the past year or two how many gay kids have chosen death over the persecution/bullying they face due to their sexual orientation? Waay too many. Now wouldn't it be a helluva lot easier to choose to be straight, rather than take your own life? Obviously, they can't choose to be straight (just like they didn't choose to be gay). Btw, Rise Against (an awesome band!) has a relatively new (and moving) song about this tragedy of bullying/suicide: RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - myotch - 02-09-2012 07:02 PM People don't choose their color. [fact] Homosexuals choose that [homosexual] lifestyle, (I believe)... [opinion, that counters known facts] There is a difference. Just ask any black guy how his parents reacted when he told them he was black. On the other hand, why would a significant portion of the population choose to be gay? RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - lucrezaborgia - 02-09-2012 07:34 PM (02-09-2012 07:02 PM)myotch Wrote: On the other hand, why would a significant portion of the population choose to be gay? South Park has the answer to this! http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/episodes/s07e08-south-park-is-gay RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - bean - 02-09-2012 08:50 PM tooktheredpill-- i loved the video, even though it was hard to watch. I deal with junior high age kids every day and have a 14 and 16 year old at home. Bullying, especially sexually based, can be devastating. Praying for all these kids that they can find peace and acceptance. RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - Tooktheredpill - 02-09-2012 09:34 PM (02-09-2012 08:50 PM)bean Wrote: tooktheredpill-- Glad you liked it. It is a very powerful song/vid - one that's not easily forgotten. (Rise Against has lots of great songs with very meaningful lyrics.) RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - bean - 02-09-2012 09:46 PM they are one of my son's favorite bands... RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - Tchaiko - 02-09-2012 11:24 PM Well then. I saw "9th Cir--" and knew immediately who had started the thread. I'm disappointed to hear that Civil Rights™ was copyrighted by the black community. It would have been nice for all citizens to be able to campaign for rights, but they got there first, so (at least according to one competent voice on here) teh gayz aren't allowed. Oh, wait. . . If we went by those rules, women shouldn't have been allowed to campaign for suffrage. . . Hmm. RE: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: Still looney after all these years - myotch - 02-10-2012 12:09 AM (02-09-2012 04:02 PM)bean Wrote: I can't think of too many marriages that have been ruined by gay marriage. Gay marriage doesn't do damage to individual marriages. The issue is that gay marriage is detrimental to marriage as an institution, which, by historical measure, is not inclusive to couples outside of couples of different genders. Marriage, as practiced today, also predates civilization, societies, and communities. Homosexual marriage does not have the benefit of historical need or societal benefit. In that way, it is trivial at best. Not to say that homosexuals cannot have longterm, even lifetime relationships with same sex partners. But to call the relationship a marriage is, bluntly, a lie, a deception, an impossibility. Tchaiko Wrote:I'm disappointed to hear that Civil Rights™ was copyrighted by the black community. It would have been nice for all citizens to be able to campaign for rights, but they got there first, so (at least according to one competent voice on here) teh gayz aren't allowed. Oh, wait. . . If we went by those rules, women shouldn't have been allowed to campaign for suffrage. . . Hmm. Civil rights applies to every single person who can claim protection under the Constitution. Opponents of gay marriage, however, don't see a ban on gay marriage as a civil rights issue. The comparison of gay marriage to 60's civil rights or to the suffrage movement falls flat on it's face. No one is saying gays can't be gays, gays can't vote, or gays have to sit at the back of the bus. I guess everyone here, and I will include Greg as well, believe those who physically assault gays should be prosecuted under state laws regarding assault. I believe gays have the right to speech, assembly, religion and conscious, the right to guns (http://www.pinkpistols.org), rights against the quartering of soldiers, a right to a trial by jury, and rights against excessive punishment, fines, and prosecution. I have a hard time seeing where, constitutionally, gays have a civil rights issue regarding the government not recognizing gay unions. |